How is my AGA content performing in Google search over the last 28 days?Prerequisite:
[email protected] must be added to the site’s Google
Search Console property with Full access (Search Console → Settings →
Users and permissions). Without it, the gsc_* tools cannot
resolve a GSC property.
What the agent does
gsc_get_context— confirms where the account publishes and which GSC properties hold its data (reverse-proxy URL wins over the CMS URL), plus the segmentation strategy used for the AGA-vs-main-domain split and amaturityblock (how long the account has been publishing) that decides the comparison cadence.gsc_get_overview— site totals (clicks, impressions, CTR, position) and the daily trend for the last 28 days, split into AGA content vs the main domain with click/impression shares. Impressions lead — they are the AI-visibility signal; clicks are the human-traffic read — andinterpretationHintscarries the deterministic readings to state as findings.gsc_compare_periodswithperiodPreset—"wow"while the account is in its first ~8 weeks publishing,"mom"or"qoq"after — for the period-over-period read, with growth shares for both impressions (impressionGrowthShare) and clicks (growthShare).- Optionally,
gsc_query_analyticswithdimensions: ["page"]or["query"]to drill into the pages or queries behind the totals.
articles_search (statuses ["published"])
against a ["page"]-dimension pull or export on the slug. Pages published
long ago with persistent zero impressions are retire candidates, diagnosed
with gsc_inspect_url and gsc_list_sitemaps.
For a deeper dive — for example, “which pages win impressions but no
clicks?” — the agent switches to the export pipeline:
gsc_export_datasetwithdimensions: ["page", "query"]— pulls the full dataset to a local file (capped pulls are auto-partitioned and reconciled, so the file is complete by construction).gsc_query_exportwithgroupBy: "page"— slices the file locally with no new API call, free to repeat with different groupings and filters.
How to read the result
Every performance response carries ameta block stating the assumptions
behind its numbers. Check it before quoting a figure:
meta.aggregationFrame— which grouping the totals came from.gsc_get_overviewanswers in thepropertyframe (the true site total); a["page"]query runs about 5% higher by construction; a["query"]query covers only named queries. Never compare totals across frames — pick one per analysis and name it.meta.completeandmeta.coverageRatio— whether the pull covered the whole named universe. When the API’s row cap was hit, the tools partition and re-pull automatically;coverageRatio(union ÷ an uncapped denominator) near 1 means full coverage. Gate impression-based claims on this; click counts survive capping either way.meta.incompleteDays— the trailing ~3 days of the window, which always revise upward as GSC finalizes data. Never trend on them.segments— the AGA-content vs main-domain split, with its strategy and confidence. When the split is unavailable the tools say so — never estimate it yourself.
tags.queryShapeclassifies queries by length intohuman,ambiguous, andai_shaped(natural-language prompts issued by AI systems — long, zero-click, and overwhelmingly desktop). Never blend the shapes into one CTR: AI-shaped zero-click means “no human present”, human-shaped zero-click means “ranked too low” — different problems, different fixes.tags.pageClassseparatescanonicalcontent pages frommain_site(brand-query-driven, a different population),cms_origin(the CMS host indexed alongside the reverse proxy — a duplicate-content split worth escalating), andtenant_subdomain(other customers’ sites inside asc-domain:property — exclude these).tags.isWebStorymarks Web Story twins of articles — AGA ships a Web Story per article under/web-stories/, so the same slug appears twice. Analyze Web Story URLs separately from the article URLs.- On
["page", "query"]pulls,meta.anonymizationshows how much traffic has no visible query at all — typically 35–50% of impressions, with a higher CTR than named queries.
position is impression-weighted
within a row — re-weight by impressions when you aggregate, never average
positions.
See also
- Search Console performance and the AGA split — property resolution, segmentation, and recency lag
- Reading Search Console data correctly — the full list of assumptions behind the numbers
- Available MCP tools — full input and output reference